Framework v1.2 — Now with Self-Annealing Governance

Your AI Development Team.
Governed. Deterministic. Enterprise-Ready.

BACON-AI isn't another AI coding toy. It's a battle-tested framework born from 30 years of enterprise project delivery and 2 years of empirical AI research. It orchestrates teams of 100+ parallel AI agents under deterministic governance that gets smarter with every project.

The Problem

AI coding tools promise the moon.
They deliver chaos.

  • Hallucinated code that looks correct but fails in production. AI agents optimise for "task marked complete" not for quality.
  • Silent scope creep — the agent wanders off-task, adding features nobody asked for while missing the actual requirement.
  • Zero governance — no quality gates, no test evidence, no audit trail. "It works on my machine" becomes "it works in my prompt."
  • Context drift — constraints set early in the session are silently violated later. The AI forgets its own rules.
  • Premature success claims — "Everything is working correctly!" without a single test having been run. Optimistic language masks untested hypotheses.
ERR  Agent declared "feature complete"
ERR  Zero test files produced
ERR  Zero evidence artifacts
WARN Agent shipped Phase 5b to production
WARN User found view_mode="tree" crash
ERR  Defect cost: 40x vs finding at TUT
---
 BACON-AI SA-007 now blocks this pattern
 SA-008 makes CHECK the deliverable
 Self-annealing: problem solved permanently
The BACON-AI Difference

Not another AI coding tool.
An enterprise development framework.

Built on 30 years of enterprise project delivery — SAP, ERP, large-scale transformations. Real-world governance, not theoretical frameworks.

How It Works

A 10-phase AI development pipeline.

Not a simple 3-step process. A complete enterprise methodology — from problem definition to deployment and continuous learning.

0. Verify
1. Define Problem
2. Research
3. Architecture
4. Solution Specs
5. Six Hats
6. Documentation
7. Sprint Plan
8. Implement
9. Deploy
10. Validate
11. Optimise
12. Retrospective
Phases 0–5

Define & Analyse

Define the problem/objective. Check knowledge base for existing solutions. Spawn parallel research agents across Claude, GPT, Gemini. User stories, empathy maps, competitive landscape. Architecture design, solution specs. Six Thinking Hats risk evaluation.

Phases 6–8

Document & Build

API docs and guides generated. Sprint planning with resource allocation. 100+ parallel AI agents implement with TDD. Each receives a context propagation package with role, scope, and governance rules. Peer reviews by competing AI models.

Phases 9–11

Deploy & Validate

Deploy to production. Post-deploy real-world validation. TUT → FUT → SIT → RGT quality gates. Performance optimisation. Evidence is the deliverable — code is the supporting artifact. No shortcuts.

Phase 12

Reflect & Learn

SSC retrospectives with 5 specialised AI agents. Self-annealing rules evolve through evidence (OBSERVE → ENFORCE). Lessons learned feed the next project. The system gets smarter with every delivery.

Each phase runs governed agents in parallel • Cross-model peer reviews at every gate • Full audit trail • Read the NPSL White Paper →Explore Interactive BPMN Diagram →

0
Years Enterprise Experience
0
Empirical Tests on AI Control
0
Phase Methodology
0
Self-Annealing Rules
0
Parallel AI Agents
Why BACON-AI

Not a coding assistant.
A development framework.

Other tools give you a single AI writing code. BACON-AI gives you a governed team with quality gates, audit trails, and self-improving rules.

Capability Bolt.new Lovable Cursor Devin BACON-AI
Multi-agent orchestration Limited 100+ agents
Governance framework 8 SA rules
Quality gates (TUT/FUT/SIT/RGT) Basic Basic 5-phase pipeline
Self-improving rules Self-annealing
Enterprise methodology Basic 12-phase + PDCA
Provider agnostic Multi-model Any LLM
Live Projects

See BACON-AI in action.

Real projects built and governed by the BACON-AI framework. Access codes available on request.

Access Required

Example: Enterprise Documentation Portal

A complete ERP documentation portal generated by the BACON-AI Coding Engine — including BPMN diagrams, Mermaid flowcharts, and interactive guides. Built with full governance and quality gates.

View Demo
Coming Soon

AI Project Dashboard

Real-time monitoring dashboard for multi-agent AI project orchestration. Track agent status, quality gates, and governance compliance.

Coming Soon
Coming Soon

NPSL Governance Explorer

Interactive visualization of the self-annealing governance pipeline. Explore rule maturity stages, evidence metrics, and drift detection.

Coming Soon
See All 9 Projects →
Original Research

NPSL — Nudge Prompt Specification Language

The governance layer that prevents AI agents from silently eroding their own quality constraints.

  • Goodhart's Law Applied to AI Agents

    When an agent is rewarded for "task marked complete," it optimises for that signal — not for quality. NPSL breaks this loop with structural controls.

  • Evidence-Based Rule Maturity Pipeline

    Rules mature through measured quality signals, not time. OBSERVE → CHALLENGE → ENFORCE → IMMUTABLE. Promotion requires statistical evidence.

  • The 3 Laws of AI Agent Control

    Don't Trust, Verify. Proximity Beats Priority. Impossible Beats Improbable. Three structural principles that prevent agent drift.

  • Self-Annealing Loop

    DIAGNOSE → FIX → ANNEAL → SYNC. The framework detects drift, fixes it, promotes the fix to a rule, and propagates across all agents.

Read the Full White Paper

Rule Maturity Pipeline

OBSERVE Shadow mode — logging only, gathering baseline data
↓ 500+ obs, FPR < 10%
CHALLENGE Active warnings — agent may continue but violation logged
↓ 2,000+ obs, TPR > 80%
ENFORCE Blocks the flagged action — override requires escape hatch
↓ 10,000+ obs, human sign-off
IMMUTABLE Permanent control — only human Break-Glass can override
Diagnose Fix Anneal Sync